Goddamn, do I hate AI as it is presently defined. The best I could describe it as being is simulated intelligence. Perhaps, to your ear, it sounds like the same thing - but it isn't. The key distinction is that the present systems are simulating intelligence rather than any form of actual intelligence. Perhaps, sometimes, it gets close to a coherent response but that is purely accidental.
At best, the system can regurgitate the content it stole trained upon, but then, what value is AI providing? It's an insult to intelligence that these trillion dollar companies somehow think that this horse and pony show is anything but smoke and mirrors. No one who actually knows how these models works would say they're intelligent. Zero context and zero comprehension is made when it comes to forming their response. Let that sink in:
How the ''''AI'''' system actually works
All that the present AI system does is this: you have a question and then you have a 'golden' response. And then you keep training the model until the system spits out something closely resembling the golden response. For example, you have a question of what's 1 + 1? Then initially the system may spit out dog or Adolf Hitler and slowly it will eventually move towards a number. Maybe it will spit out 3 then 45 then 11 then, finally, it will mostly respond with 2.
Note that I used the word 'mostly' - that's because all that happens is a number of weighted gates are calculated so that you will mostly get 2 but sometimes you may get 'go kill yourself.' Because all those weights are just probabilities rather than guarantees. You cannot guarantee that 2 will be presented for all situations. It has no understanding of what 1 is or what adding 1 to another number is. All it has is its weighted trees and zero comprehension of what it's actually doing. If you want the results from addition to be guaranteed, just use a calculator.
Note that I used the word 'mostly' - that's because all that happens is a number of weighted gates are calculated so that you will mostly get 2 but sometimes you may get 'go kill yourself.' Because all those weights are just probabilities rather than guarantees. You cannot guarantee that 2 will be presented for all situations. It has no understanding of what 1 is or what adding 1 to another number is. All it has is its weighted trees and zero comprehension of what it's actually doing. If you want the results from addition to be guaranteed, just use a calculator.
I honestly don't know how all the tech magnates don't realise how fallible the current 'AI solution' is. When the general public is staunchly against AI and those in the know (ahem) know how weak the current solution is, the level of financial collapse caused by these glue-eating CEO's will be catastrophic. It's only the financial circle jerk between the AI leaders which keeps these transparent clothes from falling apart. This all amounts to another Ponzi scheme (cough, crypto, cough) where the rich get richer while the poor somehow still end up paying for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment