This is the vision of future productivity from a company devoid of any:
Microsoft's 'vision' is of a future that is ruled by iPads and iPods and iDontCares. Their only innovation in 30 years has been an ability to react to the vision of others. This certainly isn't my vision; it looks to me like an exercise in annoyance. Unlike a lot of you, I see little attraction to a world of finger painting. I'd much rather have a world where you're jacked in, similar to the Matrix. That way we're not limited to a world where you're forced to interact with Kinect-like awkwardness. Using the bluntness of a sausage as the sole source of interaction is my vision of hell.
I work in IT but I hate smart phones. I'm a luddite when it comes to things that pinch or swipe. My idea of an interface worth building is something that gives you instant access to what you want, without silly transitions, fade-ins and fade-outs. All that crud just gets in the way of me getting where I need to go. I think as a minor diversion they're fine but, for anything that demands a degree of productivity, I'd rather go back to a lump of coal and a rock wall than sit there drawing pictures for mummy and daddy.
My preferred method of interaction for productivity-based work is a keyboard. I'm a 'keyboard guy,' which means that the majority of my interaction is preferably done with something that gives me near-instant response. Having to drag an animated cursor across a screen with a mouse is just irritating when a single key press can do the same thing with an infinite degree more accuracy, speed and tactile response.
I think the future is something that works directly with your cortex. Something that understands your thoughts and line of sight automatically so it works at the speed of a synapse. Nanoseconds vs seconds. It definitely should not be finger painting, although I doubt that my vision will be the future, given the short-sighted nature of this 'visionary look into the future.'